|

            |
A letter in response to the
article,
The Mirror, Saturday, November
23, 1822

THE MERMAID
To the Editor of the Mirror.
I see by the Papers, that the Mermaid, after having escaped the
attempts of Collectors, who would have immured her in their
Museums; and the barbarity of the Surgeons, who wanted to
dissect her, is at last to use an expression at the sound of
which every experienced man's face instinctively lengthens"
thrown into Chancery.' Alas! poor Mermaid!
It is to be hoped, that the individual who ran away with this
object of universal admiration, was not aware that she was fated
to become a Ward of Chancery; for, if he did, he may, according
to the doctrines lately promulgated, stand in a very perilous
situation. Such protégées are a sort of animal noli-me-tangere;
the coming in contact with which draws down on the unhappy
adventurer dreadful consequences.
But as this interesting personage is really in this accomplished
Court, there is now an excellent opportunity of setting at rest,
in an indubitable manner, all the anxieties which have been
excited respecting its reality. What think you, Mr. Editor, of a
reference to the Master, to inquire, and state to the Court,
whether1 the Mermaid be a Mermaid? What an opportunity would
here offer for judicial jokes and forensic witticisms! And what
a field would be opened for erudite research in the Master's
office! The copyright of the Master's Report would be a fortune.
Or, if this subject should be thought too difficult to be
attempted by the "sages of the law,'' unassisted by other
illumination, let an issue be directed, to ascertain the
momentous fact in dispute. In such a proceeding, it is obvious
that the Jury ought to be awarded de medietate; which, being
translated, for the benefit of country gentlemen, into language
that is common both to the lawyers' bar and the publicans' bar,
signifies "half and half." The combination I would suggest would
be, that one half of the Jury should consist of " matrons," to
afford the means of ascertaining the womanhood of the subject;
and the other half chosen from the Master, Wardens, and Court of
Assistants of the Worshipful Company of Fishmongers, in order to
try its ichthyology.
It is the opinion of Sir Thomas Browne (see his Vulgar Errors,
1. 5, ch. 19,) and of many other authors, that the Syrens,
mentioned by Homer in his Odyssey, were no other than Mermaids,
if that be so, how great must be the value of the individual,
now, alas ! thrown into Chancery for, as Homer speaks of them in
the dual number, it has been most reasonably argued, that they
were but two, end Eustathius gives their two names. The Court of
Chancery, then, possesses & Ward, who may be described as
Presque unique.
Sir Thomas Browne, in the place above cited, says, "No man's
eyes have escaped the picture of a Mermaid." I cannot deny that
my visual organs have encountered this universal exhibition. But
I never saw any picture of a Mermaid, which did act represent
this enchanting compound with a Mirror (I do not, Mr. Editor,
mean a copy of your interesting miscellany, though, from the
interest you take in the damsel, your work would, no doubt, be
acceptable to English Mermaids,) but a looking-glass in one
hand, and a comb in the other. 1 may add, in the only
introduction of this bi-formed being which I remember to have
witnessed on the stage, in Tom Dibdin's Harlequin Hoax ; or, A
Pantomime Rehearsed, according to my recollection, she appeared
with these appropriate ornaments.* But, Sir, the Mermaid in
question is, I am shocked to say, de-spoiled of these essential
attributes. Now, I would seriously put it to the Chancellor,
whether this be not a very alarming circumstance? and I doubt
not, that his Lordship will have no doubt, that it ought not to
be allowed to grow into a precedent. Think, Mr. Editor, only
think, what a dreadful calamity it would be, if all his
Lordship's Wards were to be in like manner deprived of their
combs and looking-glasses? Think, Sir, how many angelic faces
would-but I cannot proceed with this topic: it is too much for
my nerves; and, if pursued, would probably operate too
powerfully on the lachrymal sensibility for which his Lordship
is so justly celebrated.
But, Sir, I am not without apprehension, that some evil-minded
persons, not having the fear of the law before their eyes, but
being moved and instigated by the (Printer's) devil, and being
desirous to bring the practice of a most honorable profession
into hatred, ridicule, and contempt, and to scandalize the same,
may be tempted to convert this matter into an occasion of
sneering against the Law.-Some critics, in their labours to
explain what was the foundation of the fiction of the Syrens
(who, we have already seen, have been identified with Mermaids;,
have asserted, that the Syrens were Queens of certain small
islands, named Sirenusae, lying near Capree, in Italy, and
chiefly inhabited the promontory of Minerva, on the top of which
that Goddess had a temple. Here, it is said, there was a
renowned academy in the reign of the Syrens, famous for
eloquence and the liberal sciences; whence the fable of the
sweetness of their voices. But at length, we are told, the
students abused their knowledge, to the colouring of wrong, and
the corruption of manners; and therefore they were feigned to be
transformed into monsters, and with their music to have enticed
passengers to their ruin, and the consumption of their
patrimonies. Such ill-natured persons may perhaps ask, Whether
the temple of Law was not originally the school of eloquence,
and the academies of liberal sciences- and whether some modern
students there have not abused their knowledge to the colouring
of wrong, and the corruption of manners, and enticed clients to
their ruin, and the consumption of their patrimonies?
HOMUNCULUS.
London, Nov. 21, 1832.
* Our correspondent is here in error. The Mermaid in Harlequin
Hoax has not a looking-glass in her hand when she rises from the
ocean, but a glass of gin and water, of which she acknowledges
having drank so freely that she is half seas-over.-editor.
|